|
|
 |
How MFTs Stack Up

IV. Summary and Conclusion
Each of the three licensing laws reviewed have their differences, yet
there are similarities. Each has their strengths and their weaknesses,
whether real or perceived. Each of the provisions reviewed are enforced
and regulated by the licensing boards with various degrees of
effectiveness. Some of the differences are significant, and some are
insignificant. The laws and regulations pertaining to each profession
are founded upon differing theories. Again, our purpose is not to
criticize, but to compare. From the perspective of the marriage and
family therapists profession, however, it should be clear from a review
of this article (and the complete licensing laws and regulations
applicable to each profession) that the requirements for MFT licensure
are substantial and detailed, and that they measure up with the
psychology and clinical social work professions. Thus, if and when
questioned by a prospective employer, attorney, insurer, managed care
company, colleague in another profession, or anyone else, the MFT should
not hesitate to make use of the comparisons covered by this article.
This article appeared in the November/December 1993 issue of The
California Therapist. It is reprinted with permission of the
California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists, 7901 Raytheon
Road, San Diego, CA 92111-1606.
---------------------------------
Education
Examination
Supervised Experience
|