IV. Summary and Conclusion
Each
of the three licensing laws reviewed have their differences, yet there
are
similarities.
Each has their strengths and their weaknesses, whether real or perceived.
Each of the provisions reviewed are enforced and regulated by the licensing
boards with various degrees of effectiveness. Some of the differences are
significant, and some are insignificant. The laws and regulations pertaining
to each profession are founded upon differing theories. Again, our purpose
is not to criticize, but to compare.
From the perspective
of the marriage and family therapists profession, however, it should be
clear from a review of this article (and the complete licensing laws and
regulations applicable to each profession) that the requirements for MFT
licensure are substantial and detailed, and that they measure up with
the psychology and clinical social work professions. Thus, if and when
questioned by a prospective employer, attorney, insurer, managed care
company, colleague in another profession, or anyone else, the MFT should
not hesitate to make use of the comparisons covered by this article.
This article
appeared in the November/December 1993 issue of The California Therapist.
It is reprinted with permission of the California Association of Marriage
and Family Therapists, 7901 Raytheon Road, San Diego, CA 92111-1606.